Will the Arab states help Israel with its border problems?
Writing today at the Wall Street Journal, Max Boot has summed up the dilemma Israel faces as it confronts both Hamas and Hezbollah:
Is this a quagmire Israel can sustain for decades or centuries? No - it is not a strategy worth betting on.
Thus, Israel needs to change the rules of the game. To achieve a stable end-state for the long run, Israel needs to:
1) Change the behavior of the Hamas leadership in Gaza, or
2) Change the leadership in Gaza, or
3) Remove Gaza’s military capacity.
As I have previously discussed, a punitive raid cannot guarantee the achievement of any of these aims. A permanent reoccupation of Gaza by the Israeli army is almost certainly unsustainable over the long term.
At this point, Israel’s leaders must be hoping for external assistance to change the situation in Gaza. In my last post on this subject, I saw hints that the Israeli government may be hoping that a negotiated cease-fire will include a force of international observers inside Gaza to supervise the Hamas side of a hypothetical cease-fire. Israeli leaders may be hoping that “adult supervision” inside Gaza would prevent a return to Hamas rocket attacks.
This is obviously a fragile arrangement and one Hamas (and Hezbollah) can void at any time. So what other external help might Israel get?
Although leaders from Arab and Islamic countries have made their obligatory speeches condemning Israel’s punitive response, there seems little love lost in the Arab world for Hamas’s leadership. Four or five decades ago, flare-ups against Israel were politically beneficial to leaders in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, etc. Today, however, that is no longer the case and will not be so in the future. Thus, Israel may hope for greater help from its former Arab opponents in suppressing Hamas and Hezbollah.
Of course, it is Iran and not the Arabs that sustains Hamas and Hezbollah. These proxy militias have been Israel’s problem, and not so much a problem for the Arab countries.
Might that change? Or is there anything Israel can do to get the Arab countries to worry as much about Iran’s proxies in Lebanon and Gaza as Israel does?
With respect to Iran, Israel and the Arab states have common long term interests. The first order of business for both is Iran’s nuclear weapon and ballistic missile threats. Military cooperation between Israel and former enemies such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Iraq has been unthinkable. As the Iranian threat advances, the unthinkable may become thinkable.
But Arab leaders should also ponder the issue of Iranian proxy militias. It was politically easy for Iran to organize and support anti-Israeli militias in south Lebanon and Gaza. With that prototype now proven, Arab leaders should wonder whether Iran has the capability to extend the model to Bahrain, eastern Saudi Arabia, and (trying again) Iraq. Countering such Iranian efforts will be even more difficult after Iran becomes a nuclear weapon state.
Israel needs help from the outside if it is to achieve a stable end-state for Gaza. In the end, this will mean confronting Iran. Once again, this is not something Israel can do by itself. Will the international community help with either Gaza or Iran? Not much to hope for there. What about the Arab states? Might they find it in their interest to become Israel’s friend?
The essential dilemma Israel faces is this: It can't ignore Hamas's attacks, not only because of the damage they inflict, but also because of the terrible precedent they set. Israel has always been a state that is one battle away from destruction, and it cannot allow its enemies to think that it can be attacked with impunity. But at the same time Israel cannot do what it takes to wipe out the enemy, because of the constraints imposed by its own public, which is far less willing than in the past to suffer or inflict bloodletting.
So the Jewish state is forced to fight an unsatisfying war of attrition with Hamas, Hezbollah and other entities bent on its destruction. The current incursions are only one stage of this lengthy struggle. The odds are that once Israeli troops leave, Hamas will rebuild its infrastructure, forcing the Israelis to go back in the future.
This is the definition of a quagmire, yet Israel has no choice but to keep doing what it's doing. Unlike the French in Algeria or the Americans in Vietnam, it cannot simply pack its bags and go home. If Israel is to continue to exist, it will have to continue to wage low-intensity war for a long time to come -- definitely years, probably decades, possibly centuries.
Is this a quagmire Israel can sustain for decades or centuries? No - it is not a strategy worth betting on.
Thus, Israel needs to change the rules of the game. To achieve a stable end-state for the long run, Israel needs to:
1) Change the behavior of the Hamas leadership in Gaza, or
2) Change the leadership in Gaza, or
3) Remove Gaza’s military capacity.
As I have previously discussed, a punitive raid cannot guarantee the achievement of any of these aims. A permanent reoccupation of Gaza by the Israeli army is almost certainly unsustainable over the long term.
At this point, Israel’s leaders must be hoping for external assistance to change the situation in Gaza. In my last post on this subject, I saw hints that the Israeli government may be hoping that a negotiated cease-fire will include a force of international observers inside Gaza to supervise the Hamas side of a hypothetical cease-fire. Israeli leaders may be hoping that “adult supervision” inside Gaza would prevent a return to Hamas rocket attacks.
This is obviously a fragile arrangement and one Hamas (and Hezbollah) can void at any time. So what other external help might Israel get?
Although leaders from Arab and Islamic countries have made their obligatory speeches condemning Israel’s punitive response, there seems little love lost in the Arab world for Hamas’s leadership. Four or five decades ago, flare-ups against Israel were politically beneficial to leaders in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, etc. Today, however, that is no longer the case and will not be so in the future. Thus, Israel may hope for greater help from its former Arab opponents in suppressing Hamas and Hezbollah.
Of course, it is Iran and not the Arabs that sustains Hamas and Hezbollah. These proxy militias have been Israel’s problem, and not so much a problem for the Arab countries.
Might that change? Or is there anything Israel can do to get the Arab countries to worry as much about Iran’s proxies in Lebanon and Gaza as Israel does?
With respect to Iran, Israel and the Arab states have common long term interests. The first order of business for both is Iran’s nuclear weapon and ballistic missile threats. Military cooperation between Israel and former enemies such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Iraq has been unthinkable. As the Iranian threat advances, the unthinkable may become thinkable.
But Arab leaders should also ponder the issue of Iranian proxy militias. It was politically easy for Iran to organize and support anti-Israeli militias in south Lebanon and Gaza. With that prototype now proven, Arab leaders should wonder whether Iran has the capability to extend the model to Bahrain, eastern Saudi Arabia, and (trying again) Iraq. Countering such Iranian efforts will be even more difficult after Iran becomes a nuclear weapon state.
Israel needs help from the outside if it is to achieve a stable end-state for Gaza. In the end, this will mean confronting Iran. Once again, this is not something Israel can do by itself. Will the international community help with either Gaza or Iran? Not much to hope for there. What about the Arab states? Might they find it in their interest to become Israel’s friend?

3 Comments:
I'm not sure why you leave out the obvious - that Israel could change its policy objectives. It's BS to say that "Israel has no choice." It starves the Gazans, refuses to pull illegal settlements out of the West Bank, and keeps Arabs in a second class situation by denying them access to water and basic goods.
Not saying that Israel should pull its punches, but a strategy that only has one option - kill or be killed - is pretty moronic in this day and age.
J --
There is no "deal" with Hamas. They are committed to destroying Israel, enjoy broad Gazan support for that objective, and were voted into office precisely to make War on Israel.
In fact, after Israel has left Southern Lebanon and Gaza, at considerable domestic political cost, they have received nothing but more war, in the form constant rocket attacks and raids into Israel proper to kidnap Israeli soldiers in violation of the rules of War.
I would argue that Israel MUST give GAZANS WAR. In it's full measure -- starvation, about 50% + military age men dead (ages 14-45), about 30% of the population dead, everything in ruins, the full taste and cost of War.
Gazans chose War, now let them have it for real. With no limits.
Israel even in it's limited responses, avoiding civilian casualties, gets accused of War Crimes while Gazan attacks on purely civilian targets are celebrated by the international Media, Democrats, celebrities, and so on.
Moreover, the International Community has made it long clear it's goal is the eradication of every Jew in Israel, and also World-wide. Look at what happened in Bombay -- Pakistanis killing Jews in India. For no reason whatsoever except Muslim hatred of Jews which is inbred and irrevocable.
Finally, Obama was born and raised a Muslim, has Palestinian sympathies that run deep, spent a Summer in Pakistan in a Madrassa (in 1989 while at Columbia), and has made it clear that he favors Hamas which has raised money for him and campaigned for him (phone banks).
Israel can expect Obama to act explicitly against it, as Obama wants a "deal" with Iran and has indicated he will accept Iran's "wiping Israel off the map" in exchange for making a really big speech in Tehran.
Therefore, Israel should give Gazans a full taste of war, in all it's bitterness, instead of the half-hearted attempts to "reform" War and make it "humane." Make it brutal and nasty, and Gazans will soon tire of it.
They will always hate Jews of course, they are Muslims what else can you expect? Polygamists such as Muslims are filled with hatred, it's inevitable. But they are not required to love thy neighbors, merely refrain from rocketing them. Israel has to solve the Gazan method of digging in and rocketing Israel or it will be repeated. The lack of US protection and support with Obama means they have no reason to be moderate.
Give Gazans a full taste of War ala Germany in May 1945 and they will soon stop rocketing Israel.
看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,美髮儀器,美髮,儀器,髮型,EMBA,MBA,學位,EMBA,專業認證,認證課程,博士學位,DBA,PHD,在職進修,碩士學位,推廣教育,DBA,進修課程,碩士學位,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,廣告,課程介紹,學分班,文憑,牛樟芝,段木,牛樟菇,日式料理, 台北居酒屋,燒肉,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,造型系列,學位,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,SEO,婚宴,捷運,學區,美髮,儀器,髮型,牛樟芝,腦磷脂,磷脂絲胺酸,看房子,買房子,建商自售,自售,房子,捷運,學區,台北新成屋,台北豪宅,新成屋,豪宅,學位,碩士學位,進修,在職進修, 課程,教育,學位,證照,mba,文憑,學分班,網路廣告,關鍵字廣告,關鍵字,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,关键词,网络广告,关键词广告,SEO,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,台北住宿,國內訂房,台北HOTEL,台北婚宴,飯店優惠,住宿,訂房,HOTEL,飯店,婚宴,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,台北結婚,婚宴場地,推車飲茶,港式點心,尾牙春酒,居酒屋,燒烤,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,美髮,儀器,髮型,小套房,小套房,進修,在職進修,留學,證照,MBA,EMBA,留學,MBA,EMBA,留學,進修,在職進修,牛樟芝,段木,牛樟菇,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,住宿,民宿,飯宿,旅遊,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,美容,美髮,整形,造型,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,住宿,民宿,飯店,旅遊,美容,美髮,整形,造型,設計,室內設計,裝潢,房地產,進修,在職進修,MBA,EMBA,關鍵字排名,網路行銷,关键词排名,网络营销,網路行銷,關鍵字排名,关键词排名,网络营销,羅志祥,周杰倫,五月天,蔡依林,林志玲,羅志祥,周杰倫,五月天,蔡依林,林志玲
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home